Verify that the application has correctly installed PendSV
and SVCall handlers. The application can choose to
disable these checks by setting configCHECK_HANDLER_INSTALLATION
to 0 in their FreeRTOSConfig.h.
Earlier the System Call entry from an unprivileged task
looked like:
1. SVC for entering system call.
2. System call implementation.
3. SVC for exiting system call.
Now, the system call entry needs to make only one SVC
call and everything else is handled internally.
This PR also makes the following changes:
1. Update the Access Control List (ACL) mechanism to
grant access to all the kernel objects before the
scheduler is started.
2. Add one struct param for system calls with 5 parameters.
This removes the need for special handling for system
calls with 5 parameters.
3. Remove raise privilege SVC when MPU wrapper v2 is used.
4. Add additional run time parameter checks to MPU wrappers
for xTaskGenericNotify and xQueueTakeMutexRecursive APIs.
A task's privilege level is stored in ulTaskFlag member in the TCB. Current
implementation of portSWITCH_TO_USER_MODE() does not update this
flag but just lowers the processor's privilege level. This results in many
APIs incorrectly determining task's privilege level and access permissions -
- xPortIsAuthorizedToAccessBuffer
- xPortIsTaskPrivileged
- xPortIsAuthorizedToAccessKernelObject
This PR fixes the portSWITCH_TO_USER_MODE() implementation to correctly
update the ulTaskFlag member in the TCB before lowering the processor's
privilege level.
Add trace hook macro for most ports
In pull request #659 we introduced better support for tracing
tools like systemview. This patchset adds support for more
ports as requested in the original pull request.
This PR adds Access Control to kernel objects on a per task basis to MPU
ports. The following needs to be defined in the `FreeRTOSConfig.h` to
enable this feature:
```c
#define configUSE_MPU_WRAPPERS_V1 0
#define configENABLE_ACCESS_CONTROL_LIST 1
```
This PR adds the following new APIs:
```c
void vGrantAccessToTask( TaskHandle_t xTask,
TaskHandle_t xTaskToGrantAccess );
void vRevokeAccessToTask( TaskHandle_t xTask,
TaskHandle_t xTaskToRevokeAccess );
void vGrantAccessToSemaphore( TaskHandle_t xTask,
SemaphoreHandle_t xSemaphoreToGrantAccess );
void vRevokeAccessToSemaphore( TaskHandle_t xTask,
SemaphoreHandle_t xSemaphoreToRevokeAccess );
void vGrantAccessToQueue( TaskHandle_t xTask,
QueueHandle_t xQueueToGrantAccess );
void vRevokeAccessToQueue( TaskHandle_t xTask,
QueueHandle_t xQueueToRevokeAccess );
void vGrantAccessToQueueSet( TaskHandle_t xTask,
QueueSetHandle_t xQueueSetToGrantAccess );
void vRevokeAccessToQueueSet( TaskHandle_t xTask,
QueueSetHandle_t xQueueSetToRevokeAccess );
void vGrantAccessToEventGroup( TaskHandle_t xTask,
EventGroupHandle_t xEventGroupToGrantAccess );
void vRevokeAccessToEventGroup( TaskHandle_t xTask,
EventGroupHandle_t xEventGroupToRevokeAccess );
void vGrantAccessToStreamBuffer( TaskHandle_t xTask,
StreamBufferHandle_t xStreamBufferToGrantAccess );
void vRevokeAccessToStreamBuffer( TaskHandle_t xTask,
StreamBufferHandle_t xStreamBufferToRevokeAccess );
void vGrantAccessToMessageBuffer( TaskHandle_t xTask,
MessageBufferHandle_t xMessageBufferToGrantAccess );
void vRevokeAccessToMessageBuffer( TaskHandle_t xTask,
MessageBufferHandle_t xMessageBufferToRevokeAccess );
void vGrantAccessToTimer( TaskHandle_t xTask,
TimerHandle_t xTimerToGrantAccess );
void vRevokeAccessToTimer( TaskHandle_t xTask,
TimerHandle_t xTimerToRevokeAccess );
```
An unprivileged task by default has access to itself only and no other
kernel object. The application writer needs to explicitly grant an
unprivileged task access to all the kernel objects it needs. The best
place to do that is before starting the scheduler when all the kernel
objects are created.
For example, let's say an unprivileged tasks needs access to a queue and
an event group, the application writer needs to do the following:
```c
vGrantAccessToQueue( xUnprivilegedTaskHandle, xQueue );
vGrantAccessToEventGroup( xUnprivilegedTaskHandle, xEventGroup );
```
The application writer MUST revoke all the accesses before deleting a
task. Failing to do so will result in undefined behavior. In the above
example, the application writer needs to make the following 2 calls
before deleting the task:
```c
vRevokeAccessToQueue( xUnprivilegedTaskHandle, xQueue );
vRevokeAccessToEventGroup( xUnprivilegedTaskHandle, xEventGroup );
```
* Use new version of CI-CD Actions
* Use cSpell spell check, and use ubuntu-20.04 for formatting check
* Format and spell check all files in the portable directory
* Remove the https:// from #errors and #warnings as uncrustify attempts to change it to /*
* Use checkout@v3 instead of checkout@v2 on all jobs
---------
Memory Protection Unit (MPU) Enhancements
This commit introduces a new MPU wrapper that places additional
restrictions on unprivileged tasks. The following is the list of changes
introduced with the new MPU wrapper:
1. Opaque and indirectly verifiable integers for kernel object handles:
All the kernel object handles (for example, queue handles) are now
opaque integers. Previously object handles were raw pointers.
2. Saving the task context in Task Control Block (TCB): When a task is
swapped out by the scheduler, the task's context is now saved in its
TCB. Previously the task's context was saved on its stack.
3. Execute system calls on a separate privileged only stack: FreeRTOS
system calls, which execute with elevated privilege, now use a
separate privileged only stack. Previously system calls used the
calling task's stack. The application writer can control the size of
the system call stack using new configSYSTEM_CALL_STACK_SIZE config
macro.
4. Memory bounds checks: FreeRTOS system calls which accept a pointer
and de-reference it, now verify that the calling task has required
permissions to access the memory location referenced by the pointer.
5. System call restrictions: The following system calls are no longer
available to unprivileged tasks:
- vQueueDelete
- xQueueCreateMutex
- xQueueCreateMutexStatic
- xQueueCreateCountingSemaphore
- xQueueCreateCountingSemaphoreStatic
- xQueueGenericCreate
- xQueueGenericCreateStatic
- xQueueCreateSet
- xQueueRemoveFromSet
- xQueueGenericReset
- xTaskCreate
- xTaskCreateStatic
- vTaskDelete
- vTaskPrioritySet
- vTaskSuspendAll
- xTaskResumeAll
- xTaskGetHandle
- xTaskCallApplicationTaskHook
- vTaskList
- vTaskGetRunTimeStats
- xTaskCatchUpTicks
- xEventGroupCreate
- xEventGroupCreateStatic
- vEventGroupDelete
- xStreamBufferGenericCreate
- xStreamBufferGenericCreateStatic
- vStreamBufferDelete
- xStreamBufferReset
Also, an unprivileged task can no longer use vTaskSuspend to suspend
any task other than itself.
We thank the following people for their inputs in these enhancements:
- David Reiss of Meta Platforms, Inc.
- Lan Luo, Xinhui Shao, Yumeng Wei, Zixia Liu, Huaiyu Yan and Zhen Ling
of School of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University,
China.
- Xinwen Fu of Department of Computer Science, University of
Massachusetts Lowell, USA.
- Yuequi Chen, Zicheng Wang, Minghao Lin of University of Colorado
Boulder, USA.
* Remove __NVIC_PRIO_BITS and configPRIO_BITS check in CM3, CM4 and ARMv8.
* Add hardware not implemented bits check. These bits should be zero.
---------
Co-authored-by: Gaurav-Aggarwal-AWS <33462878+aggarg@users.noreply.github.com>
Adjust assertions related to the CMSIS __NVIC_PRIO_BITS and FreeRTOS
configPRIO_BITS configuration macros such that these macros specify the
minimum number of implemented priority bits supported by a config
build rather than the exact number of implemented priority bits.
Related to Qemu issue #1122
FreeRTOS-Kernel/portable/GCC/ARM_CM4F/port.c:399:41: error: conversion from 'uint32_t' {aka 'long unsigned int'} to 'uint8_t' {aka 'unsigned char'} may change value [-Werror=conversion]
Signed-off-by: Vo Trung Chi <chi.votrung@vn.bosch.com>
* Interrupt priority assert improvements for CM3/4/7
In the ARM_CM3, ARM_CM4, and ARM_CM7 ports, change the assertion that
`configMAX_SYSCALL_INTERRUPT_PRIORITY` is nonzero to account for the
number of priority bits implemented by the hardware.
Change these ports to also use the lowest priority for PendSV and
SysTick, ignoring `configKERNEL_INTERRUPT_PRIORITY`.
* Remove not needed configKERNEL_INTERRUPT_PRIORITY define
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Aggarwal <aggarg@amazon.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Aggarwal <aggarg@amazon.com>
Co-authored-by: Gaurav-Aggarwal-AWS <33462878+aggarg@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Gaurav Aggarwal <aggarg@amazon.com>
* Fix tickless idle when stopping systick on zero...
...and don't stop SysTick at all in the eAbortSleep case.
Prior to this commit, if vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() happens to stop
the SysTick on zero, then after tickless idle ends, xTickCount advances
one full tick more than the time that actually elapsed as measured by
the SysTick. See "bug 1" in this forum post:
https://forums.freertos.org/t/ultasknotifytake-timeout-accuracy/9629/40
SysTick
-------
The SysTick is the hardware timer that provides the OS tick interrupt
in the official ports for Cortex M. SysTick starts counting down from
the value stored in its reload register. When SysTick reaches zero, it
requests an interrupt. On the next SysTick clock cycle, it loads the
counter again from the reload register. To get periodic interrupts
every N SysTick clock cycles, the reload register must be N - 1.
Bug Example
-----------
- Idle task calls vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep(xExpectedIdleTime = 2).
[Doesn't have to be "2" -- could be any number.]
- vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() stops SysTick, and the current-count
register happens to stop on zero.
- SysTick ISR executes, setting xPendedTicks = 1
- vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() masks interrupts and calls
eTaskConfirmSleepModeStatus() which confirms the sleep operation. ***
- vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() configures SysTick for 1 full tick
(xExpectedIdleTime - 1) plus the current-count register (which is 0)
- One tick period elapses in sleep.
- SysTick wakes CPU, ISR executes and increments xPendedTicks to 2.
- vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() calls vTaskStepTick(1), then returns.
- Idle task resumes scheduler, which increments xTickCount twice (for
xPendedTicks = 2)
In the end, two ticks elapsed as measured by SysTick, but the code
increments xTickCount three times. The root cause is that the code
assumes the SysTick current-count register always contains the number of
SysTick counts remaining in the current tick period. However, when the
current-count register is zero, there are ulTimerCountsForOneTick
counts remaining, not zero. This error is not the kind of time slippage
normally associated with tickless idle.
*** Note that a recent commit https://github.com/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel/commit/e1b98f0
results in eAbortSleep in this case, due to xPendedTicks != 0. That
commit does mostly resolve this bug without specifically mentioning
it, and without this commit. But that resolution allows the code in
port.c not to directly address the special case of stopping SysTick on
zero in any code or comments. That commit also generates additional
instances of eAbortSleep, and a second purpose of this commit is to
optimize how vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() behaves for eAbortSleep, as
noted below.
This commit also includes an optimization to avoid stopping the SysTick
when eTaskConfirmSleepModeStatus() returns eAbortSleep. This
optimization belongs with this fix because the method of handling the
SysTick being stopped on zero changes with this optimization.
* Fix imminent tick rescheduled after tickless idle
Prior to this commit, if something other than systick wakes the CPU from
tickless idle, vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() might cause xTickCount to
increment once too many times. See "bug 2" in this forum post:
https://forums.freertos.org/t/ultasknotifytake-timeout-accuracy/9629/40
SysTick
-------
The SysTick is the hardware timer that provides the OS tick interrupt
in the official ports for Cortex M. SysTick starts counting down from
the value stored in its reload register. When SysTick reaches zero, it
requests an interrupt. On the next SysTick clock cycle, it loads the
counter again from the reload register. To get periodic interrupts
every N SysTick clock cycles, the reload register must be N - 1.
Bug Example
-----------
- CPU is sleeping in vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep()
- Something other than the SysTick wakes the CPU.
- vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() calculates the number of SysTick counts
until the next tick. The bug occurs only if this number is small.
- vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() puts this small number into the SysTick
reload register, and starts SysTick.
- vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() calls vTaskStepTick()
- While vTaskStepTick() executes, the SysTick expires. The ISR pends
because interrupts are masked, and SysTick starts a 2nd period still
based on the small number of counts in its reload register. This 2nd
period is undesirable and is likely to cause the error noted below.
- vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() puts the normal tick duration into the
SysTick's reload register.
- vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() unmasks interrupts before the SysTick
starts a new period based on the new value in the reload register.
[This is a race condition that can go either way, but for the bug
to occur, the race must play out this way.]
- The pending SysTick ISR executes and increments xPendedTicks.
- The SysTick expires again, finishing the second very small period, and
starts a new period this time based on the full tick duration.
- The SysTick ISR increments xPendedTicks (or xTickCount) even though
only a tiny fraction of a tick period has elapsed since the previous
tick.
The bug occurs when *two* consecutive small periods of the SysTick are
both counted as ticks. The root cause is a race caused by the small
SysTick period. If vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() unmasks interrupts
*after* the small period expires but *before* the SysTick starts a
period based on the full tick period, then two small periods are
counted as ticks when only one should be counted.
The end result is xTickCount advancing nearly one full tick more than
time actually elapsed as measured by the SysTick. This is not the kind
of time slippage normally associated with tickless idle.
After this commit the code starts the SysTick and then immediately
modifies the reload register to ensure the very short cycle (if any) is
conducted only once. This strategy requires special consideration for
the build option that configures SysTick to use a divided clock. To
avoid waiting around for the SysTick to load value from the reload
register, the new code temporarily configures the SysTick to use the
undivided clock. The resulting timing error is typical for tickless
idle. The error (commonly known as drift or slippage in kernel time)
caused by this strategy is equivalent to one or two counts in
ulStoppedTimerCompensation.
This commit also updates comments and #define symbols related to the
SysTick clock option. The SysTick can optionally be clocked by a
divided version of the CPU clock (commonly divide-by-8). The new code
in this commit adjusts these comments and symbols to make them clearer
and more useful in configurations that use the divided clock. The fix
made in this commit requires the use of these symbols, as noted in the
code comments.
* Fix tickless idle with alternate systick clocking
Prior to this commit, in configurations using the alternate SysTick
clocking, vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() might cause xTickCount to jump
ahead as much as the entire expected idle time or fall behind as much
as one full tick compared to time as measured by the SysTick.
SysTick
-------
The SysTick is the hardware timer that provides the OS tick interrupt
in the official ports for Cortex M. SysTick starts counting down from
the value stored in its reload register. When SysTick reaches zero, it
requests an interrupt. On the next SysTick clock cycle, it loads the
counter again from the reload register. The SysTick has a configuration
option to be clocked by an alternate clock besides the core clock.
This alternate clock is MCU dependent.
Scenarios Fixed
---------------
The new code in this commit handles the following scenarios that were
not handled correctly prior to this commit.
1. Before the sleep, vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() stops the SysTick on
zero, long after SysTick reached zero. Prior to this commit, this
scenario caused xTickCount to jump ahead one full tick for the same
reason documented here: 0c7b04bd3a
2. After the sleep, vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() stops the SysTick
before it loads the counter from the reload register. Prior to this
commit, this scenario caused xTickCount to jump ahead by the entire
expected idle time (xExpectedIdleTime) because the current-count
register is zero before it loads from the reload register.
3. Prior to return, vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() attempts to start a
short SysTick period when the current SysTick clock cycle has a lot of
time remaining. Prior to this commit, this scenario could cause
xTickCount to fall behind by as much as nearly one full tick because the
short SysTick cycle never started.
Note that #3 is partially fixed by 967acc9b20
even though that commit addresses a different issue. So this commit
completes the partial fix.
* Improve comments and name of preprocessor symbol
Add a note in the code comments that SysTick requests an interrupt when
decrementing from 1 to 0, so that's why stopping SysTick on zero is a
special case. Readers might unknowingly assume that SysTick requests
an interrupt when wrapping from 0 back to the load-register value.
Reconsider new "_SETTING" suffix since "_CONFIG" suffix seems more
descriptive. The code relies on *both* of these preprocessor symbols:
portNVIC_SYSTICK_CLK_BIT
portNVIC_SYSTICK_CLK_BIT_CONFIG **new**
A meaningful suffix is really helpful to distinguish the two symbols.
* Revert introduction of 2nd name for NVIC register
When I added portNVIC_ICSR_REG I didn't realize there was already a
portNVIC_INT_CTRL_REG, which identifies the same register. Not good
to have both. Note that portNVIC_INT_CTRL_REG is defined in portmacro.h
and is already used in this file (port.c).
* Replicate to other Cortex M ports
Also set a new fiddle factor based on tests with a CM4F. I used gcc,
optimizing at -O1. Users can fine-tune as needed.
Also add configSYSTICK_CLOCK_HZ to the CM0 ports to be just like the
other Cortex M ports. This change allowed uniformity in the default
tickless implementations across all Cortex M ports. And CM0 is likely
to benefit from configSYSTICK_CLOCK_HZ, especially considering new CM0
devices with very fast CPU clock speeds.
* Revert changes to IAR-CM0-portmacro.h
portNVIC_INT_CTRL_REG was already defined in port.c. No need to define
it in portmacro.h.
* Handle edge cases with slow SysTick clock
Co-authored-by: Cobus van Eeden <35851496+cobusve@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: abhidixi11 <44424462+abhidixi11@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Joseph Julicher <jjulicher@mac.com>
Co-authored-by: alfred gedeon <28123637+alfred2g@users.noreply.github.com>
It was possible for a third party that had already independently gained
the ability to execute injected code to achieve further privilege
escalation by branching directly inside a FreeRTOS MPU API wrapper
function with a manually crafted stack frame. This commit removes the
local stack variable `xRunningPrivileged` so that a manually crafted
stack frame cannot be used for privilege escalation by branching
directly inside a FreeRTOS MPU API wrapper.
We thank Certibit Consulting, LLC, Huazhong University of Science and
Technology and the SecLab team at Northeastern University for reporting
this issue.
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Aggarwal <aggarg@amazon.com>
ARMv7-M allows overlapping MPU regions. When 2 MPU regions overlap, the
MPU configuration of the higher numbered MPU region is applied. For
example, if a memory area is covered by 2 MPU regions 0 and 1, the
memory permissions for MPU region 1 are applied.
We use 5 MPU regions for kernel code and kernel data protections and
leave the remaining for the application writer. We were using lowest
numbered MPU regions (0-4) for kernel protections and leaving the
remaining for the application writer. The application writer could
configure those higher numbered MPU regions to override kernel
protections.
This commit changes the code to use highest numbered MPU regions for
kernel protections and leave the remaining for the application writer.
This ensures that the application writer cannot override kernel
protections.
We thank the SecLab team at Northeastern University for reporting this
issue.
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Aggarwal <aggarg@amazon.com>
* Clarify Cortex M7 r0p1 errata number in r0p1 specific port.
* Add ARM Cortex M7 r0p0 / r0p1 Errata 837070 workaround to CM4 MPU ports.
Optionally, enable the errata workaround by defining configTARGET_ARM_CM7_r0p0 or configTARGET_ARM_CM7_r0p1 in FreeRTOSConfig.h.
* Add r0p1 errata support to IAR port as well
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Aggarwal <aggarg@amazon.com>
* Change macro name to configENABLE_ERRATA_837070_WORKAROUND
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Aggarwal <aggarg@amazon.com>
Co-authored-by: Gaurav Aggarwal <aggarg@amazon.com>
This commit introduces a new config
configALLOW_UNPRIVILEGED_CRITICAL_SECTIONS which enables developers to
prevent critical sections from unprivileged tasks. It defaults to 1 for
backward compatibility. Application should set it to 0 to disable
critical sections from unprivileged tasks.
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Aggarwal <aggarg@amazon.com>
Phillip Stevens
Soren Ptak
Jeff Tenney
Gaurav-Aggarwal-AWS
kar-rahul-aws
Moral-Hao
Boris van der Meer
Soren Ptak
chinglee-iot
Paul Bartell
Vo Trung Chi
Chris Copeland
Dusan Cervenka
Gaurav Aggarwal
swaldhoer
j4cbo
carlo-dev-git
Cobus van Eeden
David Chalco
David Chalco
NoMaY (a user of Japan.RenesasRulz.com)
RichardBarry