7 Commits (faae819f5d8a662ec2df88205ab6d9b1871f1dd1)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Lunny Xiao	f9cfd6ce5b	Use the type RefName for all the needed places and fix pull mirror sync bugs (#24634) ... This PR replaces all string refName as a type `git.RefName` to make the code more maintainable. Fix #15367 Replaces #23070 It also fixed a bug that tags are not sync because `git remote --prune origin` will not remove local tags if remote removed. We in fact should use `git fetch --prune --tags origin` but not `git remote update origin` to do the sync. Some answer from ChatGPT as ref. > If the git fetch --prune --tags command is not working as expected, there could be a few reasons why. Here are a few things to check: > >Make sure that you have the latest version of Git installed on your system. You can check the version by running git --version in your terminal. If you have an outdated version, try updating Git and see if that resolves the issue. > >Check that your Git repository is properly configured to track the remote repository's tags. You can check this by running git config --get-all remote.origin.fetch and verifying that it includes +refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*. If it does not, you can add it by running git config --add remote.origin.fetch "+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*". > >Verify that the tags you are trying to prune actually exist on the remote repository. You can do this by running git ls-remote --tags origin to list all the tags on the remote repository. > >Check if any local tags have been created that match the names of tags on the remote repository. If so, these local tags may be preventing the git fetch --prune --tags command from working properly. You can delete local tags using the git tag -d command. --------- Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>	2 years ago
谈笑风生间	309354c70e	New webhook trigger for receiving Pull Request review requests (#24481) ... close https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/16321 Provided a webhook trigger for requesting someone to review the Pull Request. Some modifications have been made to the returned `PullRequestPayload` based on the GitHub webhook settings, including: - add a description of the current reviewer object as `RequestedReviewer` . - setting the action to either **review_requested** or **review_request_removed** based on the operation. - adding the `RequestedReviewers` field to the issues_model.PullRequest. This field will be loaded into the PullRequest through `LoadRequestedReviewers()` when `ToAPIPullRequest` is called. After the Pull Request is merged, I will supplement the relevant documentation.	2 years ago
Zettat123	9e04627aca	Fix incorrect `HookEventType` of pull request review comments (#23650) ... `HookEventType` of pull request review comments should be `HookEventPullRequestReviewComment` but some event types are `HookEventPullRequestComment` now.	2 years ago
zeripath	35d2fa744a	Fix intermittent panic in notify issue change content (#23019) ... Ensure that issue pullrequests are loaded before trying to set the self-reference. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: delvh <leon@kske.dev> Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>	2 years ago
Lunny Xiao	bd820aa9c5	Add context cache as a request level cache (#22294) ... To avoid duplicated load of the same data in an HTTP request, we can set a context cache to do that. i.e. Some pages may load a user from a database with the same id in different areas on the same page. But the code is hidden in two different deep logic. How should we share the user? As a result of this PR, now if both entry functions accept `context.Context` as the first parameter and we just need to refactor `GetUserByID` to reuse the user from the context cache. Then it will not be loaded twice on an HTTP request. But of course, sometimes we would like to reload an object from the database, that's why `RemoveContextData` is also exposed. The core context cache is here. It defines a new context ```go type cacheContext struct { ctx context.Context data map[any]map[any]any lock sync.RWMutex } var cacheContextKey = struct{}{} func WithCacheContext(ctx context.Context) context.Context { return context.WithValue(ctx, cacheContextKey, &cacheContext{ ctx: ctx, data: make(map[any]map[any]any), }) } ``` Then you can use the below 4 methods to read/write/del the data within the same context. ```go func GetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any) any func SetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key, value any) func RemoveContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any) func GetWithContextCache[T any](ctx context.Context, cacheGroupKey string, cacheTargetID any, f func() (T, error)) (T, error) ``` Then let's take a look at how `system.GetString` implement it. ```go func GetSetting(ctx context.Context, key string) (string, error) { return cache.GetWithContextCache(ctx, contextCacheKey, key, func() (string, error) { return cache.GetString(genSettingCacheKey(key), func() (string, error) { res, err := GetSettingNoCache(ctx, key) if err != nil { return "", err } return res.SettingValue, nil }) }) } ``` First, it will check if context data include the setting object with the key. If not, it will query from the global cache which may be memory or a Redis cache. If not, it will get the object from the database. In the end, if the object gets from the global cache or database, it will be set into the context cache. An object stored in the context cache will only be destroyed after the context disappeared.	2 years ago
Brecht Van Lommel	c8139c0f64	Webhooks: for issue close/reopen action, add commit ID that caused it (#22583) ... The `commit_id` property name is the same as equivalent functionality in GitHub. If the action was not caused by a commit, an empty string is used. This can for example be used to automatically add a Resolved label to an issue fixed by a commit, or clear it when the issue is reopened.	2 years ago
delvh	0f4e1b9ac6	Restructure `webhook` module (#22256) ... Previously, there was an `import services/webhooks` inside `modules/notification/webhook`. This import was removed (after fighting against many import cycles). Additionally, `modules/notification/webhook` was moved to `modules/webhook`, and a few structs/constants were extracted from `models/webhooks` to `modules/webhook`. Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>	2 years ago