5 Commits (f6fd501841816f5e5c1c9a30fbc4c9a2a6f987bc)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
zeripath	787f6c3227	Ensure that Webhook tasks are not double delivered (#21558) ... When re-retrieving hook tasks from the DB double check if they have not been delivered in the meantime. Further ensure that tasks are marked as delivered when they are being delivered. In addition: * Improve the error reporting and make sure that the webhook task population script runs in a separate goroutine. * Only get hook task IDs out of the DB instead of the whole task when repopulating the queue * When repopulating the queue make the DB request paged Ref #17940 Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>	2 years ago
oliverpool	b6e81357bd	Add Webhook authorization header (#20926) ... _This is a different approach to #20267, I took the liberty of adapting some parts, see below_ ## Context In some cases, a weebhook endpoint requires some kind of authentication. The usual way is by sending a static `Authorization` header, with a given token. For instance: - Matrix expects a `Bearer <token>` (already implemented, by storing the header cleartext in the metadata - which is buggy on retry #19872) - TeamCity #18667 - Gitea instances #20267 - SourceHut https://man.sr.ht/graphql.md#authentication-strategies (this is my actual personal need :) ## Proposed solution Add a dedicated encrypt column to the webhook table (instead of storing it as meta as proposed in #20267), so that it gets available for all present and future hook types (especially the custom ones #19307). This would also solve the buggy matrix retry #19872. As a first step, I would recommend focusing on the backend logic and improve the frontend at a later stage. For now the UI is a simple `Authorization` field (which could be later customized with `Bearer` and `Basic` switches):  The header name is hard-coded, since I couldn't fine any usecase justifying otherwise. ## Questions - What do you think of this approach? @justusbunsi @Gusted @silverwind - ~~How are the migrations generated? Do I have to manually create a new file, or is there a command for that?~~ - ~~I started adding it to the API: should I complete it or should I drop it? (I don't know how much the API is actually used)~~ ## Done as well: - add a migration for the existing matrix webhooks and remove the `Authorization` logic there _Closes #19872_ Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Gusted <williamzijl7@hotmail.com> Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>	2 years ago
6543	54e9ee37a7	format with gofumpt (#18184) ... * gofumpt -w -l . * gofumpt -w -l -extra . * Add linter * manual fix * change make fmt	3 years ago
wxiaoguang	750a8465f5	A better go code formatter, and now `make fmt` can run in Windows (#17684) ... * go build / format tools * re-format imports	3 years ago
Lunny Xiao	42354dfe45	Move webhook type from int to string (#13664) ... * Move webhook type from int to string * rename webhook_services * finish refactor * Fix merge * Ignore unnecessary ci Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>	4 years ago