github-forks
/
gitea
mirror of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Projects Releases Activity
15,994 Commits
17 Branches
225 Tags
799 MiB
Commit Graph

5 Commits (b3c71ec64f12437772c35c48d4471ca8b8f244d5)

Author SHA1 Message Date
silverwind 50bd7d0b24
Remove the service worker () 
It's been disabled by default since 1.17
(https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/18914), and it never really
delivered any benefit except being another cache layer that has its own
unsolved invalidation issues. HTTP cache works, we don't need two cache
layers at the browser for assets.

## ⚠️ BREAKING

You can remove the config `[ui].USE_SERVICE_WORKER` from your `app.ini`
now.
silverwind c7612d178c
Remove meta tags `theme-color` and `default-theme` () 
As discussed in
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24953#issuecomment-1565630156.

## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️

1. The `ui.THEME_COLOR_META_TAG` setting has been removed. If you still
need to set the `theme-color` meta tag, add it via
`$GITEA_CUSTOM/templates/custom/header.tmpl` instead.

2. The non-standard `default-theme` meta-tag added in
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/13809 has been removed. Third
party code that needs to obtain the currently loaded theme should use
the `theme-<name>` class on the `<html>` node instead, which reflect the
currently active theme.
silverwind 517f9f5aa4
Don't set meta `theme-color` by default () 
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/24321. By not setting
this meta tag, Safari will use body color for chrome and out-of-viewport
areas, which looks much better then static mismatching green.

As per
[MDN](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/meta/name/theme-color)
it's really only Apple browsers who still support this tag, most others
have dropped support.
wxiaoguang e57e1144c5
Add ONLY_SHOW_RELEVANT_REPOS back, fix explore page bug, make code more strict () 
Follow 

After I eat my own dogfood, I would say that
ONLY_SHOW_RELEVANT_REPOS=false is necessary for many private/enterprise
instances, because many private repositories do not have
"description/topic", users just want to search by their names.

This PR also adds `PageIsExploreRepositories` check, to make code more
strict, because the `search` template is shared for different purpose.

And during the test, I found a bug that the "Search" button didn't
respect the "relevant" parameter, so this PR fixes the bug by the way
together.

I think this PR needs to be backported.
Lunny Xiao c53ad052d8
Refactor the setting to make unit test easier () 
Some bugs caused by less unit tests in fundamental packages. This PR
refactor `setting` package so that create a unit test will be easier
than before.

- All `LoadFromXXX` files has been splited as two functions, one is
`InitProviderFromXXX` and `LoadCommonSettings`. The first functions will
only include the code to create or new a ini file. The second function
will load common settings.
- It also renames all functions in setting from `newXXXService` to
`loadXXXSetting` or `loadXXXFrom` to make the function name less
confusing.
- Move `XORMLog` to `SQLLog` because it's a better name for that.

Maybe we should finally move these `loadXXXSetting` into the `XXXInit`
function? Any idea?

---------

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>