Commit Graph

8 Commits (3746a625f55d24fc48a0198c8108bdebfd4edeb3)

Author SHA1 Message Date
KN4CK3R f79c9e817a
Use `crypto/sha256` (#29386)
Go 1.21 improved the performance of `crypto/sha256`. It's now similar to
`minio/sha256-simd`, so we should just use the standard libs.

https://go.dev/doc/go1.21#crypto/sha256
https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/408795
https://github.com/multiformats/go-multihash/pull/173
11 months ago
JakobDev c548dde205
More refactoring of `db.DefaultContext` (#27083)
Next step of #27065
1 year ago
zeripath 1319ba6742
Use minio/sha256-simd for accelerated SHA256 (#23052)
minio/sha256-simd provides additional acceleration for SHA256 using
AVX512, SHA Extensions for x86 and ARM64 for ARM.

It provides a drop-in replacement for crypto/sha256 and if the
extensions are not available it falls back to standard crypto/sha256.

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2 years ago
Jason Song 9607750b5e
Replace fmt.Sprintf with hex.EncodeToString (#21960)
`hex.EncodeToString` has better performance than `fmt.Sprintf("%x",
[]byte)`, we should use it as much as possible.

I'm not an extreme fan of performance, so I think there are some
exceptions:

- `fmt.Sprintf("%x", func(...)[N]byte())`
- We can't slice the function return value directly, and it's not worth
adding lines.
    ```diff
    func A()[20]byte { ... }
    - a := fmt.Sprintf("%x", A())
    - a := hex.EncodeToString(A()[:]) // invalid
    + tmp := A()
    + a := hex.EncodeToString(tmp[:])
    ```
- `fmt.Sprintf("%X", []byte)`
- `strings.ToUpper(hex.EncodeToString(bytes))` has even worse
performance.
2 years ago
flynnnnnnnnnn e81ccc406b
Implement FSFE REUSE for golang files (#21840)
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.

Fix #16132

Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2 years ago
zeripath 716fcfcf72
Make every not exist error unwrappable to a fs.ErrNotExist (#20891)
A lot of our code is repeatedly testing if individual errors are
specific types of Not Exist errors. This is repetitative and unnecesary.
`Unwrap() error` provides a common way of labelling an error as a
NotExist error and we can/should use this.

This PR has chosen to use the common `io/fs` errors e.g.
`fs.ErrNotExist` for our errors. This is in some ways not completely
correct as these are not filesystem errors but it seems like a
reasonable thing to do and would allow us to simplify a lot of our code
to `errors.Is(err, fs.ErrNotExist)` instead of
`package.IsErr...NotExist(err)`

I am open to suggestions to use a different base error - perhaps
`models/db.ErrNotExist` if that would be felt to be better.


Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2 years ago
wxiaoguang 49dd906753
Use base32 for 2FA scratch token (#18384)
* Use base32 for 2FA scratch token
* rename Secure* to Crypto*, add comments
3 years ago
Lunny Xiao de8e3948a5
Refactor auth package (#17962) 3 years ago